There was an article in the Fin Review earlier this week by Paul Oslington which looked at how unfair dismissal laws were working under the new regime.The end result of the piece was that there not not enough data to make a judgment either way.I will leave it to others to examine the data, but this is one person's perspective who acts for Employers of varying sizes, large and small, who has been invloved in both the new regime and previous ones.
Yes, unfair dismissal claims appear to have increased, however I suspect that this is more to do with the fact that 85% of all businesses were exempt from such claims during the time of Workchoices so I don't believe there is any evidence that demonstrates that it is easier to "win" for employees under the new laws.
The next point is that the vast majority(I would say 95%) of claims never go to hearing because they resolve well before that point.There are several reasons for this, the biggest of which is that it costs a lot of money for the parties to proceed with these claims.For the Employer there is also the valid consideration of not only paying legal fees but their timey time being spent on dealing with the issues in the case, when they could be doing something more productive.
This is coupled with the fact that, for both sides, even if you "win" the case, the other side will, in almost every case, not have to pay your costs.Therefore there is very little incentive for an employee to engage a lawyer or advocate if, at the end of it all, the money they get from the victory goes straight to the lawyer.And the same applies to the employer-even if they"get up" they are still facing a bill from their lawyer.
All of this encourages settlement, which is the stated aim of Fair Work Australia.Employers have valid concerns about paying "go away money" and those concerns are more valid where the employee "tries something on" when they were dismissed validly.However, my experience is that these types of sitiations, where the Employer has done things correctly, are few and far between.
So, what's the solution?My strong view is that Employers can help themselves reduce these claims by dealing with the dismissal in a legal and compliant way by having systems in place and giving employees and opportunity to fix up performance.Also, by only using summary dismissal in appropriate situations and by doing things "by the book".Too many employers, large and small, fall down in these areas time and time again.Sure, there will still be "try on" claims, but these will still be the small minority.
On another note, good luck to my Sea Eagles tonight as they take on the Storm in the top of the table clash.A preview to the Grand Final?Let's hope so......
And its fantasy football time again(the US version) and me and my mates have the draft this weekend.Looking forward to it and fingers crossed I don't stuff up my picks...again.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Labels
- BlandsLaw (41)
- Andrew Bland (37)
- Employment Law (24)
- Fair Work Australia (20)
- Fair Work Act (12)
- employment law firm (11)
- employment lawyer (10)
- Unfair Dismissal (9)
- Industrial Relations (8)
- Employment Contracts (6)
- Julia Gillard (6)
- NFL (6)
- social media policy (6)
- Andrew Gordon (5)
- Chris Broad (5)
- Employment Contract (5)
- Modern Awards (5)
- employer obligations (5)
- minimum wage (5)
- workplace policies (5)
- Fair Work Ombudsman (4)
- Tony Abbott (4)
- bullying in the workplace (4)
- dismissal (4)
- employee entitlements (4)
- social media (4)
- Andrew Bland.OHS laws (3)
- Collective agreements (3)
- Cricket (3)
- Facebook (3)
- Fair Work Australia Commissioners (3)
- Giants (3)
- Individual Flexibility Agreements (3)
- Linfox social media (3)
- Manly (3)
- Texans (3)
- Unions (3)
- World Series (3)
- bullying (3)
- election (3)
- enterprise agreement (3)
- minimum wage decision (3)
- social media policies (3)
- workplace bullying (3)
- Airservices Australia (2)
- David Jones (2)
- Fair Work Commission (2)
- Packers (2)
- Rangers (2)
- Restraint of Trade (2)
- Unfair dismissal claims (2)
- changes to Fair Work Act (2)
- discrimination (2)
- employee or contractor (2)
- maternity leave (2)
- paid maternity leave (2)
- paid parental leave (2)
- parental leave (2)
- union right of entry (2)
- AWAs (1)
- Ashes (1)
- Australian (1)
- B2B Social Media (1)
- British Airways (1)
- Brodie Panlock (1)
- Broncos (1)
- Budgie Smugglers (1)
- Burnside (1)
- Colts (1)
- Costello (1)
- Dandy Warhols (1)
- David Gallop (1)
- EBA (1)
- FWA social media (1)
- FWO (1)
- Falcons (1)
- Flexible Work arrangements (1)
- Forward With Fairness (1)
- Frank Lowy (1)
- Fraser- Kirk (1)
- Howard (1)
- IFA (1)
- India (1)
- Kevin Pietersen (1)
- Kirsty Fletcher (1)
- Linfox (1)
- Manning (1)
- Matty Johns (1)
- Melbourne Cup (1)
- Menere v Poolrite Equipment Pty Ltd and Anor (1)
- Oakes (1)
- Octopus (1)
- Patriots (1)
- Peter Switzer (1)
- Q andA (1)
- Qantas strike (1)
- Rachel Wells (1)
- Retailers (1)
- Sarah Waterhouse (1)
- Sex Discrimination (1)
- Sexual Harrassment (1)
- Shane Warne (1)
- So You Think (1)
- Spain (1)
- Super Bowl (1)
- Vivienne Storey (1)
- Worplace Relations (1)
- Yankees (1)
- adverse action (1)
- amendment to Fair Work Act (1)
- bonus schemes (1)
- bullying legislation (1)
- cashing out (1)
- casual employees (1)
- contractor (1)
- course of employment (1)
- court orders (1)
- enterprise agreements (1)
- go away money (1)
- harassment (1)
- industrial relations tribunal (1)
- managing social media (1)
- medical certificate (1)
- minimum wage decision 2012 (1)
- new laws to protect workers (1)
- ohs (1)
- penalties for underpayment of wages (1)
- penalty rates (1)
- performance management (1)
- permanent employee (1)
- privacy (1)
- profit share (1)
- protection of workers (1)
- reputation on social media (1)
- right of entry (1)
- right to request flexible working arrangements. flexible working arrangements (1)
- sham contracting (1)
- sick leave (1)
- social media and business reputation (1)
- social media law (1)
- sunday work (1)
- swearing (1)
- termination (1)
- texting (1)
- work injuries (1)
- workplace disputes (1)
No comments:
Post a Comment